YoutubeTwitterFacebookLinked in
jim killock's blog

One thing the No campaign got right

By on . Comments (0)

The True Wales No to law making powers campaign, fantastically amateur as it seemed to be, got at least one thing right, when they claimed that a Welsh legislature would need more than sixty AMs.

Fourteen of the Welsh AMs make up the cabinet. There are five scrutiny committees, five legislative committees and nine other committees.

Assuming half the sixty AMs make up a government, nearly half the government benches are in the cabinet, and about half the remainder are presumably taking up committee chairs. That leaves a tiny number of real backbenchers from within the governing parties.

It must be nearly impossible to sack a duffer. Who do you replace them with? Not following Welsh politics as closely as I once did, I wonder how this plays in practice.

I got the impression a few years ago that many “ministers” were in fact heavily managed spokespeople, with virtually no knowledge of what they were doing. Sometimes they would have such an obvious lack of intelligence that you couldn’t really believe they understood the policies they were being asked to promote.

Rebellion must also be very difficult. While up to now this may have mattered little, if Wales does enact laws, the ability to rebel must become more important. There may be a need to dissent: but where does the dissent come from, if everyone either has a plum job, or is next in line for a plum job?

The No Campaign have made a really valid point. A serious, law making Welsh Assembly requires a few more politicians, to provide scrutiny and make some trouble.


Comments (2)

  1. Plashing Vole:
    Mar 05, 2011 at 02:28 PM

    I agree. It means there's a massive payroll vote and therefore little chance of the assembly resisting legislation, and scrutiny will be severely limited. You could say the same of the UK coalition's MPs too

  2. Jim Killock:
    Mar 06, 2011 at 08:01 AM

    Yes, that's true. As a proportion it must be worse in Wales, but it's a factor in all Parliamentary systems I guess



This thread has been closed from taking new comments.

Jim Killock's site